Opportunity Details

Back to Explorer
Closing soonGrantTrackPartner

Developing methods to assess the presence, functions and sensitivity of groundwater ecosystems

European Commission·Multilateral

This Horizon Research and Innovation Action funds research to develop and validate methods for assessing the presence, functions, sensitivity, and ecological status of groundwater ecosystems. It is intended for research consortia working on groundwater biodiversity, ecotoxicity, data standards, and scientific evidence to inform EU water policy and protection measures.

Go / No-Go Memo

This opportunity looks relevant, but the strongest path is likely through a partner or consortium.

Partner

This is a research-focused Horizon Europe call on groundwater ecosystems, with no explicit humanitarian or Movement-specific implementation pathway. Source information does not establish realistic eligibility or a clear participation route for IFRC or National Societies beyond general consortium participation.

Strategic fit

strong

Academic is the strongest profile match at 90/100; relevance is 18/100.

Eligibility risk

moderate

Eligible applicant types include "> General conditions 1. Admissibility Conditions: Proposal page limit and layout described in Annex A and Annex E of the Horizon Europe Work Programme General Annexes. Proposal page limits and layout: described in Part B of the Application Form available in the Submission System. 2. Eligible Countries described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes. A number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon Europe projects. See the information in the Horizon Europe Programme Guide . 3. Other Eligible Conditions The Joint Research Centre (JRC) may participate as member of the consortium selected for funding as a beneficiary with zero funding, or as an associated partner. The JRC will not participate in the preparation and submission of the proposal - see General Annex B. described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes. 4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion described in Annex C of the Work Programme General Annexes. 5a. Evaluation and award: Award criteria, scoring and thresholds are described in Annex D of the Work Programme General Annexes. 5b. Evaluation and award: Submission and evaluation processes are described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes and the Online Manual . 5c. Evaluation and award: Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes. 6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants described in Annex G of the Work Programme General Annexes. Specific conditions described in the [specific topic of the Work Programme] Application and evaluation forms and model grant agreement (MGA): Application form templates — the application form specific to this call is available in the Submission System Standard application form (HE RIA, IA) Evaluation form templates — will be used with the necessary adaptations Standard evaluation form (HE RIA, and others.

Deadline feasibility

moderate

The call closes in 8 days, so proposal capacity is the main constraint.

Funding attractiveness

strong

The tracked ceiling is €10M across 2 awards.

Partnership need

moderate

This may be stronger with a Academic lead or co-applicant based on fit scores.

Recommended next action

Ignore

Expected Outcome

Project results are expected to contribute to all of the following expected outcomes: - the knowledge of existing groundwater ecosystems [1] is improved, supporting policymakers and technical experts in assessments of their presence, functions and condition or status, and their role for climate change mitigation; - society benefits from enhanced knowledge and awareness of pollution and overexploitation risks to groundwater ecosystems and the ecosystem services provided by them, including of possible implications for other related ecosystems (associated aquatic and dependent terrestrial ecosystems) and for human health as well as for food and water security, disaster risk reduction and resilience building; - the EU water polices are supported with new scientific evidence and public authorities are better equipped for setting effective measures for the protection of groundwater biodiversity and their possible links to groundwater-dependent ecosystems.

Scope

The European Environment Agency (EEA)’s report on Europe's state of water (2024) [2] highlighted that 77% of groundwater, which supplies two thirds of the EU's drinking water, is in good chemical status. For groundwater not reaching good chemical status, the report identified nitrates, pesticides and pharmaceuticals among main issues. However, less is known about contaminants of emerging concern, such as perfluorinated substances (e.g.

PFAS), microplastics and antimicrobial resistance. The Commission proposal [3] to revise the lists of surface- and groundwater pollutants and their standards in the Water Framework Directive, in the Groundwater Directive and in the Environmental Quality Standards Directive aims to address these concerns. Although freshwater standards can serve as a benchmark, standards that are protective for freshwater ecosystems may not be sufficiently protective for groundwater ecosystems. [4] Much stronger evidence on presence, functions and sensitivity of groundwater ecosystems is required for a reliable hazard assessment.

Significant knowledge gaps exist regarding groundwater ecosystems and their biodiversity in Europe, making it challenging to establish their effective protection. Proposals should address such gaps, which would ultimately lead to better protection of our precious drinking water resources, as well as groundwater biodiversity and geodiversity, but also groundwater (aquatic and terrestrial)-dependent ecosystems and biodiversity. More specifically proposals under this topic should include all of the following activities: - improve and develop innovative methods, including by utilising sensors (e.g. biosensors, remote sensors), for assessing and characterising groundwater ecosystems and their sensitivity, and identifying the presence and functions of different taxonomic groups and organisms; - establish harmonised, validated, and ultimately standardised, methods and generate reliable experimental data on acute and chronic effects for assessing ecotoxicity of pollutants as regards groundwater ecosystems and in particular sensitive/ vulnerable ecosystems, with the aim to prioritize substances and deriving groundwater standards to protect them; - identify a suite of biological and physico-chemical quality elements in view of a possible future assessment and classification of groundwater ecological status for inclusion in EU water legislation.

This should include developing criteria and targets related to the temporary or long-term impacts on groundwater ecosystems. Where relevant, activities should build and expand on the results of past and ongoing EU-funded projects and initiatives, for example projects funded by the co-funded partnership “Water4All”, with focus on groundwaters, to share experiences, reach synergies and avoid duplication. Proposals are encouraged to combine inter-disciplinary expertise and integrate perspectives from different governance levels.

Concrete efforts should be made to ensure that the data produced in the context of the funded project is FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Re-usable), exploring workflows that can provide “FAIR-by-design” data, i.e., data that is FAIR from its generation. Possibilities offered by the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC) and by relevant European research infrastructures including the Catalogue of Life (COL), DiSSCo, LifeWatch ERIC, eLTER and MIRRI-ERIC (and any other relevant research infrastructure prioritised by the European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures (ESFRI) [5] ) to store and give access to research data could be considered where relevant. Proposals should foresee appropriate resources to ensure close cooperation with the EC Knowledge Centre for Biodiversity (KCBD) and its Science Service.

The research actions are expected to yield valuable new insights and data, supporting and informing future assessments by IPBES. The JRC can provide estimates of groundwater recharge and contribution of groundwater to streamflow, based on continental scale hydrological modelling, and consider testing the methods developed in the project, for the purposes of continental scale assessment of groundwater-dependent ecosystems. International cooperation with Mediterranean countries is encouraged. [1] Groundwater ecosystems, in a broad sense, encompass systems formed by organisms inhabiting water-filled spaces in the subsurface, including sediments and rocks, the hyporheic zone beneath rivers, the interfaces at springs and lakes, and the zone from the groundwater table surface down to the deepest habitable conditions, such as cave waters. These ecosystems are open systems that maintain direct connections with other aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. [2] https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/publications/europes-state-of-water-2024 [3] https://environment.ec.europa.eu/publications/proposal-amending-water-directives_en [4] See for example EMA (European Medicines Agency, 2018).

Guideline on assessing the environmental and human health risks of veterinary medicinal products in groundwater (EMA/CVMP/ERA/103555/2015,London). [5] https://ri-portfolio.esfri.eu/

Environmental SustainabilitySDG 6SDG 13SDG 15ResearchHORIZON-CL6-2026-01-BIODIV-02EU Funding & Tenders

Related opportunities

Closing soonTrackPartner

FY 2026 Notice of Funding Opportunity: Innovative Coordinated Access and Mobility Pilot Program

Johnita S Glover Transportation Program Analyst

This grant funds innovative capital projects under the FY 2026 Innovative Coordinated Access and Mobility (ICAM) pilot program to improve coordination of transportation and non-emergency medical transportation services. It is intended to benefit transportation-disadvantaged older adults, people with disabilities, and people with low income. Eligible applicants include state departments of transportation, designated recipients, local governmental entities operating public transportation services, and eligible subrecipients such as private nonprofits.

This is a U.S. federal transit grant for capital projects and transportation coordination, which is outside IFRC and National Society core humanitarian programming. Eligibility is restricted to U.S.-based public entities and specific nonprofit subrecipients, and the opportunity does not indicate an international or Movement participation pathway.

Ignore

Climate & EnvironmentClimate FinanceOther
$12.0MCloses todayrelevance 22
Closing soonTrackPartner

Cooperative Agreement for Affiliated Partner with the Gulf Coast Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (CESU)

Geological Survey

This cooperative agreement supports public health systems in India to prevent, detect, and respond to infectious disease threats. It focuses on strengthening public health workforce capacity, disease surveillance, laboratory systems, emergency preparedness and response, and antimicrobial resistance, with a One Health approach. The effort is intended to help control outbreaks at their source and improve overall health security capacity.

The opportunity is relevant to health security, surveillance, and outbreak response, but it is limited to India and appears oriented toward government/public-health system strengthening. It is open to several U.S.-style applicant types, yet there is no explicit indication that IFRC or National Societies are intended applicants or partners.

Track

Disasters & CrisesPreparedness for ResponseHealth Systems Strengthening
$350K2 days leftrelevance 40
Closing soonTrackPartner

Cooperative Agreement for Affiliated Partner with the Alaska Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (CESU)

Geological Survey

This cooperative agreement supports strengthening and sustaining public health systems in Ghana to improve prevention, early detection, and response to infectious disease threats. It funds work on laboratory capacity, surveillance, emergency response, workforce development, and sequencing/bioinformatics, with an emphasis on border districts and rapid detection of public health threats. The expected outcome is a more resilient national system able to better prevent avoidable epidemics and respond effectively to threats.

The opportunity is highly relevant thematically for public health security and surveillance, but it is country-specific to Ghana and appears structured as a CDC cooperative agreement with eligibility that may favor U.S. and partner institutions. No explicit route for IFRC or National Societies is provided, so strategic relevance is only moderate.

Track

Disasters & CrisesPreparedness for ResponseDisease Surveillance
$453K2 days leftrelevance 40